# Ranking the Four Most Recent Prominent UNC Basketball Transfers
The North Carolina Tar Heels have long been a powerhouse in college basketball, with a storied history of national championships and Final Four appearances. Under head coach Hubert Davis, the program has increasingly leaned on the transfer portal to bolster its roster in the modern era of college hoops. The 2025 offseason was particularly active for UNC, as the team looked to rebound from a disappointing early NCAA Tournament exit. With key departures like RJ Davis exhausting eligibility and others such as Elliot Cadeau and Ian Jackson entering the portal (and ultimately leaving), Davis and his staff targeted high-impact transfers to address needs in size, scoring, and perimeter play.
As of November 2025, the most recent prominent transfers to join the Tar Heels are from the 2025 portal cycle, a group that has generated significant buzz heading into the 2025-26 season. These additions helped UNC assemble one of the stronger transfer classes in the ACC, ranked around No. 22 nationally by some outlets. The four standout incoming transfers—Henri Veesaar (from Arizona), Kyan Evans (from Colorado State), Jarin Stevenson (from Alabama, via a unique re-transfer situation after initially committing elsewhere), and Jonathan Powell (from West Virginia)—represent a mix of immediate contributors and high-upside talents.
Ranking them involves considering factors like prior production, portal rankings (e.g., ESPN and 247Sports), fit with UNC’s system, remaining eligibility, and projected impact. Veesaar and Evans appeared in ESPN’s Top 100 transfers, highlighting their prominence. Here’s a detailed breakdown, ranked from most to least impactful based on these criteria as the season approaches.
### 1. Henri Veesaar (Center, from Arizona – Ranked No. 1 Impact)
At the top of the list is 7-foot Estonian big man Henri Veesaar, widely regarded as UNC’s biggest portal coup of the cycle. Veesaar, who committed to the Tar Heels in early April 2025, was one of the most sought-after centers available. Ranked as high as No. 14 overall in ESPN’s transfer rankings and the No. 2 center in the portal by 247Sports, he brings the size and skill that UNC desperately lacked in recent seasons.
In his time at Arizona, Veesaar showed flashes of dominance despite limited starting opportunities behind more established Wildcats. The sophomore (with two years of eligibility remaining) averaged 9.4 points, 5.0 rebounds, and a team-high 1.1 blocks per game, shooting efficiently from the field and even stepping out to hit threes occasionally. His rim protection was elite in spurts, and his mobility for a 7-footer allows him to fit Hubert Davis’s up-tempo style.
UNC’s frontcourt was a glaring weakness in 2024-25—no player averaged more than 0.9 blocks—and Veesaar directly addresses that. Analysts have pegged him as a potential starter from day one, capable of anchoring the defense while providing offensive versatility with his passing and mid-range touch. His arrival was hailed as a “major transfer portal win,” and early practice footage released by the program showed him dominating in the paint alongside returning pieces like Seth Trimble and freshman Caleb Wilson.
Veesaar’s international experience (he played professionally in Estonia before college) adds maturity, and his decision to leave a Sweet 16 Arizona team for more minutes in Chapel Hill speaks to his confidence. If he lives up to the hype, he could be an All-ACC caliber player and push UNC back into Final Four contention. His ranking atop this list is unquestioned—he’s the transformative piece Davis targeted to “get bigger.”
### 2. Kyan Evans (Guard, from Colorado State – Ranked No. 2 Impact)
Sliding in at No. 2 is Colorado State transfer Kyan Evans, a dynamic guard who committed as UNC’s third portal addition in 2025. Ranked No. 85 in ESPN’s Top 100 transfers, Evans brings scoring punch and playmaking to a backcourt that lost significant production.
The junior guard exploded onto the scene with the Rams, helping lead them deep into March Madness conversations. Known for his quickness, pull-up jumper, and ability to create in pick-and-roll sets, Evans has the tools to thrive in Davis’s motion offense. His commitment came amid interest from multiple power-conference programs, underscoring his status as a high-priority target.
With Elliot Cadeau’s departure leaving a void at point guard, Evans projects as a key facilitator alongside returning veteran Seth Trimble. Early reports from Chapel Hill highlight his leadership and work ethic, and he’s expected to contribute double-digit scoring right away. Paired with sharpshooters like Jonathan Powell, Evans could form a potent perimeter attack.
While not quite the game-changer Veesaar is on defense, Evans’s offensive upside and immediate eligibility make him a close second. His ranking reflects his proven production at a mid-major level and the seamless fit he provides for a Tar Heels squad needing guards who can score in bunches.
### 3. Jarin Stevenson (Forward, from Alabama – Ranked No. 3 Impact)
Jarin Stevenson earns the third spot in this ranking, a hometown talent returning to North Carolina roots after a stint at Alabama. The 6-foot-11 forward from Pittsboro (just outside Chapel Hill) initially committed to Alabama out of high school, shocking many UNC fans, but he re-entered the portal in 2025 and chose the Tar Heels.
Stevenson, who has multiple years of eligibility left, offers elite length and versatility. At Alabama, he showed perimeter skills for his size, knocking down threes and defending multiple positions. His athleticism allows him to run the floor and finish above the rim, making him a perfect modern forward in Davis’s system.
What elevates Stevenson to “prominent” status is his potential—he was a high school star at Seaforth High and brings local fervor with him. Practice clips have shown him lining up alongside Veesaar for a towering frontcourt, potentially creating matchup nightmares. Analysts note his defensive versatility could make him a Swiss Army knife off the bench or even a starter.
He ranks below Veesaar and Evans due to slightly lower prior production and portal buzz, but his upside is enormous. If Stevenson develops his consistency, he could climb higher as the season progresses.
### 4. Jonathan Powell (Shooting Guard, from West Virginia – Ranked No. 4 Impact)
Rounding out the top four is Jonathan Powell, UNC’s first 2025 portal commitment. The 6-foot-6 wing from West Virginia committed without even visiting Chapel Hill initially, a testament to the Tar Heels’ pull.
As a freshman with the Mountaineers, Powell averaged 8.3 points and showed elite shooting stroke, starting 23 games. Ranked No. 153 in the portal by some services, he’s a classic “shooter” addition to replace departing perimeter threats.
Powell’s length and shooting make him a natural fit for spotting up off drives from Evans or Trimble. Early footage from UNC practices has him draining threes effortlessly, and he’s expected to provide spacing that opens the lane for Veesaar.
He slots fourth because his freshman stats were solid but not eye-popping, and he may start as a role player rather than a star. Still, in a league where shooting is premium, Powell’s skill set could prove invaluable, especially if he builds on his rookie year.
### Overall Outlook and Context
These four transfers—Veesaar, Evans, Stevenson, and Powell—represent Hubert Davis’s aggressive approach to rebuilding after a turbulent 2024-25 season. Combined with returners like Seth Trimble and high school additions, UNC’s roster has the depth and talent to compete for an ACC title and beyond. The portal has become essential for blue-blood programs like North Carolina, and this group’s blend of size (Veesaar, Stevenson), scoring (Evans), and shooting (Powell) addresses multiple weaknesses.
As the 2025-26 season tips off, eyes will be on how quickly they gel. Veesaar, in particular, has the potential to be a breakout star, but all four could play pivotal roles in returning the Tar Heels to elite status. The transfer era is here to stay, and UNC’s latest haul is proof of its effectiveness when executed well.
(Word count: 1,128)
Leave a Reply